Haverhill Financial Research · Published October 10, 2026
Summary: Haverhill price target $7 (12 months)
SELLAS is a $2.5 billion bet on one leukemia trial that could read out any week. If the Phase 3 REGAL trial works, the company has a real product; if it fails, we think the shares are worth about $1.40. Weighing both outcomes, our 12-month price target of $7 (through October 2027) sits about 40% below the $11.65 close, so we rate the shares Sell.

Company filings through the Q2 2026 Form 10-Q; Haverhill Financial Research model; price as of Nasdaq close Oct 9, 2026
The setup is better than most. REGAL passed its interim futility test in January 2025, and blinded survival across both arms is running at roughly twice what this patient group usually lives.
The price already assumes a win. At $11.65 the stock needs better-than-even trial odds and peak sales above about $1.2 billion, which we think the trial's narrow approved use cannot reach on its own.
Our view: the science may well work, but the stock is ahead of it. We would turn positive below about $5 before the readout, or after a clean win with a hazard ratio near 0.5.
Investment thesis in brief
Our thesis: REGAL has a fair chance of working, but even a win opens a small market, and the share price already pays for a large one.
What we like. REGAL is testing galinpepimut-S (GPS), a vaccine against the WT1 protein found on most leukemia cells, in patients who have just reached a second remission. That group has no standard treatment beyond watching and waiting or low-intensity chemotherapy, and usually lives six to eight months. The trial cleared its interim futility test in January 2025, and blinded survival across both arms was above 12 months at that point. Few small-cap biotechs reach a Phase 3 readout with that much support behind them.
What the market may be missing. The approved use, if REGAL works, would cover only about 1,900 US patients a year by our count. Even at a premium price, that supports peak sales in the hundreds of millions, not billions. A $2.5 billion valuation needs the drug to move into earlier lines of treatment, which would take another trial and several years.
What holds us back. The readout is binary and close, so a miss would erase most of the value in a day. Blinded data also cannot tell us whether GPS is working or the trial simply enrolled healthier patients. And the final analysis has only 80 deaths behind it, which means GPS needs a large survival benefit to reach statistical significance.
How does the business actually make money?
Today it doesn't: SELLAS has no product revenue and funds itself by selling shares. If REGAL succeeds, money would come from one product sold into one narrow slot in leukemia care.
What it would sell. GPS is a course of about 15 injections given over roughly a year, starting once a patient is in remission. It is meant to train the immune system to find the few leukemia cells that survive chemotherapy, which is what causes relapse. SELLAS licenses GPS from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Who would pay. Hospitals and oncology practices would buy it, and insurers would reimburse it. With a median age at diagnosis near 69, Medicare would be the main payer, so the price would need to hold up in Medicare's drug reviews.
Why they would keep paying. Each patient buys one course, so revenue depends on a steady flow of new patients rather than repeat use. The case for paying is that no drug is approved to keep these patients in remission. That gives GPS a clear spot if it works, but not a large one.

American Cancer Society 2026 estimate for new cases; all later stages are Haverhill Financial Research estimates
At a $250,000 course and half of eligible patients treated, the US label is worth about $240 million a year at peak. Adding Europe and Japan through a partner takes our base case to about $400 million worldwide.
The second product. SLS009 (tambiciclib) is a pill that blocks CDK9, a protein leukemia cells use to resist the standard azacitidine-plus-venetoclax regimen. SELLAS licenses it from GenFleet Therapeutics. In 35 patients with hard-to-treat relapsed AML, adding it produced a 46% response rate with no dose-limiting side effects. A frontline trial has enrolled 28 of a planned 80 patients and reports topline data in Q4 2026.
The pipeline at a glance. GPS (galinpepimut-S), the WT1 peptide vaccine, is in the Phase 3 REGAL trial for AML patients in second remission who are not going to transplant; enrollment closed in Q1 2024 and topline comes after the 80th death. SLS009 (tambiciclib), the oral CDK9 inhibitor, is in a Phase 2 trial in newly diagnosed AML alongside azacitidine and venetoclax, with 28 of 80 patients enrolled and topline due in Q4 2026. SLS009 is also preclinical in pancreatic cancer with RAS inhibitors, where an academic-led trial is planned.
The REGAL trial: the one number that decides the stock
REGAL's final analysis starts once 80 patients have died, and the last count SELLAS gave was 78, on May 11, 2026. Everything in this report turns on what that analysis shows.
The design. REGAL randomly assigns patients 1:1 to GPS or to their doctor's choice of best available treatment (watchful waiting, a hypomethylating drug, venetoclax or low-dose cytarabine). All are in a second remission after salvage chemotherapy and are not going to transplant. The only primary endpoint is overall survival. Enrollment closed in Q1 2024.
What the blinded data shows. At the January 2025 interim, fewer than half of patients had died, and median survival across both arms was above 12 months against about 6 months expected. In a random sample, 80% of GPS patients mounted an immune response to WT1. SELLAS has repeated since then that survival "appears longer than expected."

SELLAS press releases, Jan 23, 2025 to Aug 11, 2026; deaths per month are Haverhill calculations
Deaths ran at about one a month through May, then the count went quiet. The long wait for the last two deaths cuts both ways. If GPS works, its patients should be living longer, so the final deaths would arrive slowly. But slow pooled deaths can also mean both arms enrolled healthier patients than the trial assumed, and blinded data cannot separate the two.
The statistical bar. Eighty deaths is a small final analysis for a survival trial. Using the standard approximation for a 1:1 trial, GPS needs a hazard ratio of about 0.65 or lower to be significant, meaning roughly a third lower risk of death at any point. The interim look spent part of the trial's error budget, so the real bar is slightly stricter.

Haverhill Financial Research calculation (Schoenfeld approximation, no allowance for the interim look); Phase 2 figures from SELLAS
GPS's earlier Phase 2 study showed a far larger gap, 21.0 months against 5.4 months, but it was small and not randomized. Our base case assumes REGAL lands between those two marks: good enough to win, not good enough to match Phase 2.
What do the numbers say?
SELLAS has no revenue, spends about $10 million a quarter and has paid for it by issuing shares. The balance sheet is the strongest it has been, but shareholders have been diluted heavily along the way.

SELLAS quarterly and annual results, Q1 2025 to Q2 2026
Losses are small for a Phase 3 company. Net loss was $18.0 million in the first half of 2026 and $26.9 million for all of 2025. Cash used in operations was $16.4 million in the first half, about $8 million a quarter. The rise in R&D is mostly drug manufacturing and regulatory work for a possible approval filing, which SELLAS is paying for before it knows the result.
No debt, and cash for well over a year. Cash was $138.3 million on June 30, 2026, against total liabilities of $7.7 million. SELLAS says that covers at least the next 12 months; at the current burn it would last about four years. A launch would change that quickly.

SELLAS balance sheets, Dec 31, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026; cash per share is Haverhill's calculation
The dilution behind the cash. Investors exercised warrants for $67.2 million in 2025 and another $82.9 million in the first half of 2026, mostly at $1.41 to $2.00 a share. In March 2026 SELLAS also set up a $150 million at-the-market program with TD Cowen, which lets it sell new shares into the market at any time; none had been sold by August. Counting the 9.7 million warrants, 2.6 million options and 3.3 million restricted shares still outstanding, we put the fully diluted count at about 218 million.
Check the figures: Q2 2026 Form 10-Q · Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · Q2 2026 results · Full-year 2025 results · Q3 2025 results
Competition, moat and management
GPS would face no direct rival in its exact slot, but it would compete for the same patients with cheaper, familiar drugs and with a fast-growing set of targeted pills.
Who it competes with. Low-intensity chemotherapy, azacitidine or decitabine with or without venetoclax, is what most older patients in remission get today; it is REGAL's comparator, so GPS must beat it on survival. Targeted pills against FLT3, IDH1, IDH2 and menin help only patients carrying those mutations, while GPS works regardless of mutation because most AML carries WT1. Oral azacitidine is used as maintenance after a first remission, a label GPS would need a new trial to reach. Donor stem cell transplants suit younger, fitter patients and were excluded from REGAL; GPS is aimed at those who cannot go to transplant.
Where the moat is real. If approved, GPS would be the only drug labeled for keeping second-remission AML patients alive, and it is mutation-agnostic. It is a vaccine with mild side effects, which matters for patients averaging nearly 70.
Where it is thin. Doctors already reach for azacitidine and venetoclax in this setting, and those are cheap and familiar. Targeted pills keep moving earlier in treatment, which could shrink the pool of patients who reach a second remission at all. And a peptide vaccine is not hard to copy once the WT1 approach is proven.
Management and governance. CEO Angelos Stergiou founded SELLAS and has run it since its 2017 combination with Galena Biopharma. The company is small, with a board and management team built around one program. In July 2026 an arbitrator dismissed SELLAS's claims against 3D Medicines, which licensed GPS rights in Greater China; SELLAS accrued about $1.0 million for fees it must pay. That leaves the China partnership's value uncertain.
What is it worth?
We value SELLAS at $7 per share over the next 12 months (to October 2027), a probability-weighted blend of three REGAL outcomes. That is about 40% below the $11.65 close, which supports a Sell.
| Assumption | Trial miss | Modest win | Clean win |
|---|---|---|---|
| The trial | |||
Chance of this outcome Interim passed futility | 45% | 35% | 20% |
REGAL hazard ratio About 0.65 or lower to win | Above 0.65 | 0.55–0.65 | Near 0.5 |
Chance FDA approves One trial, 80 deaths | — | 75% | 90% |
| The market | |||
Peak worldwide sales US label: ~1,900 patients a year | — | $400M | $1.2B |
Value / peak sales Typical for a new drug | — | 3x | 4x |
SLS009 value Before its own pivotal trial | $200M | $250M | $400M |
| Funding | |||
Net cash, Oct 2027 Incl. warrant and option exercise | $110M | $245M | $245M |
New shares sold Through the ATM after a win | None | ~11M at $14 | ~11M at $14 |
Diluted shares Incl. warrants, options, RSUs | ~218M | ~228M | ~228M |
| Value per share | $1.42 | $6.11 | $21.74 |
| Weighted by the odds above | |||
| Probability-weighted value $7.13 | Price on Oct 9 $11.65 | Haverhill price target $7 –40% |
Our method. SELLAS has no earnings or sales to value, so we value each trial outcome and weight them by our odds:
If REGAL wins, estimate GPS's peak worldwide sales from the patient funnel and a course price.
Multiply peak sales by what investors typically pay for a newly approved drug (3 to 4 times peak sales), then by the chance the FDA approves on one 80-death trial.
Add a value for SLS009 and the cash we expect in October 2027, after spending and any new share sales.
Divide by fully diluted shares, including the new shares we expect SELLAS to sell after a win.
If REGAL misses, GPS is worth nothing in our model, and the shares are worth cash plus SLS009.
Why these numbers. A 45% chance of a miss is better odds than the typical Phase 3 cancer trial, reflecting the clean interim and long pooled survival. Our base peak sales of $400 million assume a $250,000 course, half of the ~1,900 eligible US patients treated, and a partner in Europe and Japan. The clean-win case adds a move into first remission, which would need another trial but is a much larger group.
What the price implies. The odds matter more than any other input. If the chance of a miss fell from 45% to 30%, with the difference going to a modest win, our value would rise only to about $7.80. Holding our win and miss values fixed, $11.65 implies about a 99% chance REGAL succeeds. Put another way, the market is pricing the outcome as close to certain, when the honest answer is closer to a coin flip.
Today's valuation, for reference. At $11.65, diluted equity is worth about $2.5 billion, or about $2.4 billion after cash and exercise proceeds. That is roughly six times our base-case peak sales for a drug that is not yet approved.
What are the real risks?
The biggest risk is simple: REGAL misses and the shares fall toward cash. We rank the rest by how much they would move our value per share.
REGAL misses. We put the chance near 45%. A miss leaves cash and SLS009, about $1.42 a share, roughly 88% below today's price.
The FDA asks for another trial. Eighty deaths in one open-label study is thin evidence for a first approval. A borderline hazard ratio near 0.65 would invite a request for more data and push revenue out by years.
Dilution after a win. Companies usually sell stock into the jump after good news. SELLAS already has a $150 million program ready to do exactly that, and launch costs would likely need more.
A smaller market than hoped. Second-remission patients who skip transplant are a narrow group, and targeted pills keep moving earlier in treatment, which could shrink it further.
The readout keeps slipping. The count has sat at 78 deaths since May. Every quarter of waiting costs about $8 million of cash and leaves the shares exposed to rumors.
SLS009 disappoints. Its Q4 2026 frontline data are early and single-arm. Weak results would remove the cushion in our miss case.
The China partnership is lost. The July 2026 arbitration went against SELLAS, so we give the 3D Medicines deal no value.
Risks 1 and 2 decide most of the gap between our cases, and both resolve within about a year.
What would change our mind?
Our Sell rests on one idea: the market prices a near-certain win, and even a win opens a market too small for today's valuation. These are the specific signals that would prove that wrong in either direction.
Signals that would move us to Hold or Buy
A clean topline. A hazard ratio of 0.55 or lower, with median survival at least six months longer on GPS than on best available treatment.
The FDA signs off on one trial. A pre-filing meeting where the FDA agrees REGAL alone can support approval.
A real partner. A licensing deal for Europe or Japan with more than $100 million upfront, which would confirm a larger market than we model.
The price falls below about $5 before the readout, with nothing else changed.
Strong SLS009 data. Complete remissions in more than half of frontline patients who stopped responding early to azacitidine and venetoclax.
Signals that would make us more bearish
A borderline result. A hazard ratio between 0.60 and 0.65, or a win driven by one subgroup.
Silence into 2027. No 80th-death announcement by year-end without a clear reason from the company.
Selling before the data. Shares sold through the ATM program, or insider sales, before topline results.
Catalysts to watch
The next big test is the 80th REGAL death, which SELLAS will announce when it happens; topline results should follow within weeks.

SELLAS 2026 releases and Q2 2026 Form 10-Q; dates after the 80th death are Haverhill estimates
Sources and disclosures
Every company figure in this report comes from SELLAS's own filings and releases, linked below. The analysis, model and price target are Haverhill Financial Research's own work.
Disclosures. Haverhill Financial Research is a publisher of general financial commentary. This report is not personalized investment advice and does not consider any reader's financial situation; readers should do their own research. Price targets are estimates of value, not guarantees, and clinical-stage biotech stocks can lose most of their value on a single trial result. The author of this post does not hold a position in SLS. Data as of October 9, 2026.

